@article{oai:sgul.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000665,
 author = {葛西, 俊治},
 issue = {94},
 journal = {札幌学院大学人文学会紀要 = Journal of the Society of Humanities},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {A new qualitative approach to summarize a clinical psychological interview was introduced based on the logical inference called abduction given by C.S. Pierce. Any statement in an interview is "amplified" by adding naturally inferred descriptions that should be accepted by the disciplinary matrix of professionals in clinical psychology, with the assessed degree of validity evaluated by the interviewer or researcher, ranging from 1 （highly valid） to 3 （not so much highly valid but very effective in understanding the statement）. One of the advantages of this method is that the interviewer or researcher can elicit a tentative theory about the clinet's inner world even when the number of the similar clients is small or the amount of talks is very limited. Several basic standpoints concerning this method were discussed: 1）each client has his/her own "real world" or "personal construct" proposed by G.A. Kelly, 2） the undestanding or interpretation of what the client talked does not belong to him/her but to the interviewer or researcher who has constructed the schema to understand the client, 3） the amplified discourses through abduction inference （with the degree of validity attached to each added statement） works as a reservoir to make a tentative theory about the client's inner world for the the disciplinary matrix. Discusssion was made about the figurative understanding called synecdoche in the inference of abduction., Bulletin, 研究ノート, Research Note},
 pages = {103--115},
 title = {アブダクションに基づく拡充法 : 臨床心理学における質的アプローチのために},
 year = {2013}
}