WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "85adf088-c128-4148-b50f-5dc8da5ac175"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "2327", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2327"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:sgul.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002327", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["3524", "3523"], "item_5_biblio_info_12": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2001-03-21", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "69", "bibliographicPageEnd": "36", "bibliographicPageStart": "13", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "札幌学院大学人文学会紀要"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Journal of the Society of Humanities", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_5_description_10": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "広島県で起こったある強盗殺人事件の被告人に関して, 弁護士から心理学鑑定を要請された。被告人が容疑を認める発言をした上申書に, 被告人以外の者の手が加えられている可能性について検討してほしいとの内容であった。勾留中に同人がつけていた日記との対照を通じて, 両文書の著者の同一性を吟味することにした。両文書について, 定量的分析と定性的分析を施した。前者はひとつの「文」を構成する文節数の分布の, そして後者は「文体」の比較である。定性的分析の結果, 両文書の文節数の分布は平均で4文節離れており, 分布の重複は20%に過ぎないことが明らかとなった。また「日記」の定性的分析から明らかとなった, 被告人に特徴的な5つの「文体」のうち, 「理由の表現」と「false start文」について両文書間に差異が認められた。残りの三つの文体, 「行為主体の交代の不明示」「表現の反復」「敬語の不適切な使用」には差異が見られなかった, あるいは上申書では用いられていなかった。しかし著者の同一性を支持する証拠も得られなかった。これらの分析結果から, 両文書の作者を同一であるとみなすことの危険性が主張された。", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_5_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Regarding a robbery and murder case that occurred in Hiroshima Prefecture, the author was requested by a lawyer to examine the possibility that a third person had added to the accused\u0027s written statements to authorities in which he admitted to committing the murder. Two kinds of documents - written statements given to police and a \"diary\" written by the accused while in police custody - were compared and examined both quantitatively and qualitatively to determine whether both had been written by the same author. In the quantitative examination, the two documents were compared in terms of the distribution of the numbers of paragraphs in each text. This examination showed that the difference of the mean numbers of paragraphs was about 4 paragraphs and that the overlapping of the two distributions was as little as 20%. The qualitative examination revealed five kinds of characteristic \"styles of writing\" in the accused\u0027s \"diary\". In two of the five stylistic features (\"explanation style\" and \"false start sentences\"), differences were found between the two kinds of documents. In the remaining three (\"invisible turn of the agents\", \"expressional repetition\" and \"inappropriate use of honorific words\") no differences were detected, although no proof supporting the author\u0027s identity was found. The results of these examinations suggest the possibility of third person involvement in the accused\u0027s written statements and it cannot be concluded that the author of the two documents is the same.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_description_15": {"attribute_name": "表示順", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "6", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_description_16": {"attribute_name": "アクセション番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "KJ00000180064", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_description_8": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_description_9": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_5_source_id_1": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN1009127X", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_5_source_id_19": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "09163166", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_5_text_6": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "札幌学院大学人文学部"}]}, "item_5_text_7": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Faculty of Humanities, Sapporo Gakuin University"}]}, "item_5_title_3": {"attribute_name": "論文名よみ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "アル ケイジ ジケン ノ キョウジュツ シリョウ ニ オケル サクセイシャ ドウイツセイ ノ シンリガクテキ ケントウ"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "森, 直久"}, {"creatorName": "モリ, ナオヒサ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "3523", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "MORI, Naohisa", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "3524", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-02-24"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00000180064.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1300000.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00000180064.pdf", "url": "https://sgul.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2327/files/KJ00000180064.pdf"}, "version_id": "4bf2edf7-0ec9-44b7-96a1-8c21d276587d"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "刑事事件", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "心理学鑑定", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "文体", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Criminal case", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Psychological examination", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Style of writing", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "ある刑事事件の供述資料における作成者同一性の心理学的検討", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "ある刑事事件の供述資料における作成者同一性の心理学的検討"}, {"subitem_title": "A Psychological Examination on the Author\u0027s Identity in Criminal Case Documents", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "5", "owner": "3", "path": ["393"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10742/00002558", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-02-24"}, "publish_date": "2017-02-24", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2327", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["ある刑事事件の供述資料における作成者同一性の心理学的検討"], "weko_shared_id": 3}
ある刑事事件の供述資料における作成者同一性の心理学的検討
http://hdl.handle.net/10742/00002558
http://hdl.handle.net/10742/00002558771f9593-6497-4b6b-96bf-58b6faeced77
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00000180064.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-02-24 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | ある刑事事件の供述資料における作成者同一性の心理学的検討 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | A Psychological Examination on the Author's Identity in Criminal Case Documents | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 刑事事件 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 心理学鑑定 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 文体 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Criminal case | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Psychological examination | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Style of writing | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN1009127X | |||||
論文名よみ | ||||||
タイトル | アル ケイジ ジケン ノ キョウジュツ シリョウ ニ オケル サクセイシャ ドウイツセイ ノ シンリガクテキ ケントウ | |||||
著者 |
森, 直久
× 森, 直久× MORI, Naohisa |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
札幌学院大学人文学部 | ||||||
著者所属(英) | ||||||
en | ||||||
Faculty of Humanities, Sapporo Gakuin University | ||||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | 広島県で起こったある強盗殺人事件の被告人に関して, 弁護士から心理学鑑定を要請された。被告人が容疑を認める発言をした上申書に, 被告人以外の者の手が加えられている可能性について検討してほしいとの内容であった。勾留中に同人がつけていた日記との対照を通じて, 両文書の著者の同一性を吟味することにした。両文書について, 定量的分析と定性的分析を施した。前者はひとつの「文」を構成する文節数の分布の, そして後者は「文体」の比較である。定性的分析の結果, 両文書の文節数の分布は平均で4文節離れており, 分布の重複は20%に過ぎないことが明らかとなった。また「日記」の定性的分析から明らかとなった, 被告人に特徴的な5つの「文体」のうち, 「理由の表現」と「false start文」について両文書間に差異が認められた。残りの三つの文体, 「行為主体の交代の不明示」「表現の反復」「敬語の不適切な使用」には差異が見られなかった, あるいは上申書では用いられていなかった。しかし著者の同一性を支持する証拠も得られなかった。これらの分析結果から, 両文書の作者を同一であるとみなすことの危険性が主張された。 | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Regarding a robbery and murder case that occurred in Hiroshima Prefecture, the author was requested by a lawyer to examine the possibility that a third person had added to the accused's written statements to authorities in which he admitted to committing the murder. Two kinds of documents - written statements given to police and a "diary" written by the accused while in police custody - were compared and examined both quantitatively and qualitatively to determine whether both had been written by the same author. In the quantitative examination, the two documents were compared in terms of the distribution of the numbers of paragraphs in each text. This examination showed that the difference of the mean numbers of paragraphs was about 4 paragraphs and that the overlapping of the two distributions was as little as 20%. The qualitative examination revealed five kinds of characteristic "styles of writing" in the accused's "diary". In two of the five stylistic features ("explanation style" and "false start sentences"), differences were found between the two kinds of documents. In the remaining three ("invisible turn of the agents", "expressional repetition" and "inappropriate use of honorific words") no differences were detected, although no proof supporting the author's identity was found. The results of these examinations suggest the possibility of third person involvement in the accused's written statements and it cannot be concluded that the author of the two documents is the same. | |||||
書誌情報 |
札幌学院大学人文学会紀要 en : Journal of the Society of Humanities 号 69, p. 13-36, 発行日 2001-03-21 |
|||||
表示順 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 6 | |||||
アクセション番号 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | KJ00000180064 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09163166 |